Today’s workforce is mobile – they are scattered across locations and are connected by computers, smartphones and other devices. This expanding workforce puts new risk and strain on your organization, especially when it comes to labor laws and IRS compliance. Ensuring IRS compliance is paramount and easily achieved with automated technologies designed for the mobile workforce. This session will discuss how state-regulated labor laws, if ignored, can put your organization at risk and what you can do to minimize the risk of a class-action lawsuit. We’ll also discuss recent cases and their financial impact to organizations like yours. This session will help you:
|
Danielle Lackey
General Counsel
Motus, LL
Connect Online with this Speaker
|
As General Counsel for Motus, Danielle is charged with overseeing company legal matters. Prior to Motus, Danielle co-founded and served as CEO to Cadence Counsel, a legal services company that provides variable attorney staffing solutions to law firms and in-house teams. She previously practiced as a white-collar litigator at Latham & Watkins, where she represented major corporations and senior executives in complex civil and criminal matters. Danielle’s experience practicing law in California ensures she’s up to speed on the latest developments surrounding California Labor Code section 2802, which requires proper reimbursement for CA employees.
|
Rodney Harrison
Ogletree Deakins
Connect Online with this Speaker
|
Rodney Harrison is a shareholder with the law firm Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart. He has practiced in the areas of labor and employment law since 1995. In addition to advising clients on a wide variety of labor and employment related topics, Rodney has assisted numerous employers in developing and implementing legally defensible reimbursement programs for the use of personally owned automobiles by employees to make deliveries to customers. In addition, Rodney has defended both franchisors and franchisees in numerous federal and state wage and hour class actions involving the alleged under-reimbursement of automobile expenses.